About this site

This resource is hosted by the Nelson Mandela Foundation, but was compiled and authored by Padraig O’Malley. It is the product of almost two decades of research and includes analyses, chronologies, historical documents, and interviews from the apartheid and post-apartheid eras.

Chapter Thirteen: The Questions that Remain Unanswered


This book reviews events from 1976 to 1996, spanning 20 years of recent history, and provides a unique overview of violence in KwaZulu/Natal over a period of 16 years.

Its approach is unique in that it provides a comprehensive perspective of the viewpoints of both the African National Congress (ANC) and the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP). It not only describes in full the theories put forward by each to explain the conflict, but also identifies the evidence which appears to support each theory.

The book does not attempt to judge the validity of either theory. It is for the reader to decide which theory seems the more credible, the more substantiated by the evidence of past events. The book leaves open the question whether one theory provides a complete explanation of events, leaving the other discredited and valueless as a basis for understanding the conflict. It also leaves open the question whether there are elements of truth in both the theories described and, if so, whether there is equal culpability for the conflict on both sides.

In short, the book raises more questions than it answers. The questions that could be asked are legion. Some of the possible queries are identified below, however, for the aid they may provide in assessing the validity of the rival theories put forward by the ANC and the IFP.

Questions Regarding the ANC Theory

In May 1990, after the lifting of the bans on the ANC and other organisations in February that year, the Zulu monarch, King Goodwill Zwelithini, urged the Zulu nation to join with the former state president, Mr F W de Klerk, and make 'one huge block for democracy'. Was this not a reflection of what the ANC had long feared-the formation of a coalition between 5m whites and 7m Zulus, forming an effective power bloc against its 'vanguard' role in the liberation of South Africa? Did the ANC not realise the danger from early on, and take active steps to weaken and if possible destroy Inkatha so as to prevent this power bloc from forming?

Did Inkatha instigate the conflict in Natal, in its role as surrogate of the former South African state? Did the ANC act only in self-defence? If so, what accounts for the deaths of some 400 IFP leaders and office-bearers, not in the heat of battle, but in what appeared to be a series of carefully planned and executed assassinations?

Why were the IFP's warlords not prosecuted in the 1980s, after the Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) had won interim interdicts against them? Was it merely because the police were partisan towards Inkatha? Was it rather because the evidence was not sufficient to warrant arrest and prosecution, or sustain conviction? Why did Cosatu agree to settle its case against Inkatha, following the alleged attack on Ashdown in February 1988? If Cosatu's evidence was as strong as it asserted, why did it not prosecute the case to a conclusion, and prove to the world Inkatha's culpability for the violence? Why were none of the other interim interdict applications brought by Cosatu pursued to the point of final hearing?

Was a 'third force' to blame for triggering the violence and giving it continuing momentum? If so, what is the strength of the evidence supporting this theory? Could a third force have set the violence in motion if conflict between the ANC and IFP had not initially been triggered in other ways, by other factors? Did a third force initiate the tension between Inkatha-supporting hostellers and militant youth at the Mzimhlophe Hostel in 1976, during the Soweto revolt? Or did the police force instead take advantage of the tension that had already arisen between the youth and the hostellers to increase the pressure on the 'radicals' it regarded as 'the enemy'?

Did Umkhonto we Sizwe, the ANC's armed wing, play no role in the conflict, despite its evident capacity to do so? If it did become involved, was its role limited to training and assisting ANC 'self-defence units' (SDUs) whose mandate was to protect their communities against IFP aggression? Was the purpose of the SDUs purely defensive, or were they in fact conceived of and established as 'combat units', as articles in The African Communist, journal of the South African Communist Party (SACP), implied?

If Inkatha began the conflict because it feared the haemorraghing of its support to the United Democratic Front (UDF), and later the ANC, why did the IFP not only win the provincial election in April 1994 (albeit by a fractional majority) but also secure 20% more of the vote in KwaZulu/Natal than the ANC? Could this discrepancy in the support accorded the two rival parties have been the product of electoral fraud? If so, why did the Independent Electoral Commission-charged with certifying whether the election had been 'free and fair'-not nullify the results of the election in the province?

Was the former 'independent' homeland of Transkei indeed used as a springboard for attacks against the IFP in Natal in the 1990s? Did Umkhonto have bases in the Transkei, and did it obtain guns and ammunition from the Transkei Defence Force? If this was not the case, why did the government throw a 'ring of steel' around the Transkei in late 1992? Why did the massacres of IFP supporters appear to decline thereafter?

Was the violence that broke out on the Reef in July 1990 indeed the result of the IFP's attempt to establish a political presence in the area? Had Inkatha not had such a presence for many years, reflected, inter alia, in the mass rallies held by its president, Chief Mangosuthu Buthelezi, at the Jabulani stadium in Soweto from the early 1970s? Was the violence not sparked instead by attacks on IFP members and their houses, as well as by the ANC's call for a Week of Action aimed at securing the disbandment of KwaZulu and the KwaZulu Police (KZP)-a call criticised by a UDF president, Mr Archie Gumede, as well as by the Pan-Africanist Congress? Why did the ANC demand the disbandment of KwaZulu and the KZP while seeking a rapprochement with the leaders of other homelands, both 'independent' and self-governing? Why were IFP members driven out of hostels in Sebokeng before and after the Inkatha rally on 26 July 1990, which was supposed to have marked the start of the violence? Why did the ANC's leader, Mr Nelson Mandela, endorse the view that Inkatha was not welcome in the Vaal Triangle?

Why have the Trust Feed killings in 1988 become notorious around the world, while the KwaShange massacre in 1987-in which two policemen were convicted of the murder of 13 Inkatha youths-has been forgotten? Why was the Boipatong massacre of some 50 people referred to the Security Council of the United Nations, but not the Battle of the Forest in the Richmond area in 1991-in which some 25 IFP supporters were ambushed and mowed down by gunfire and some 30 others thereafter executed in cold blood? Why was a group calling itself the Human Rights Commission (now the Human Rights Committee) and involved in monitoring the violence described in the press as an 'independent' agency when its director and most of its trustees had clear links with the UDF and, in time, the ANC?

Why did the Commission of Inquiry Regarding Public Violence and Intimidation (the Goldstone commission) not deal with the evidence put before it by the South African Police (SAP) in 1992, indicating that Umkhonto was involved in attacks on the IFP? Why did it not probe SAP evidence that police and army uniforms were being used by ANC and Umkhonto operatives-during attacks on IFP leaders and supporters-to cast suspicion on the security forces and strengthen 'third-force' allegations? Why did it not investigate the claims by the SAP that Umkhonto cadres were involved in smuggling some 22 000 tons of armaments into the country, and that much of this came via the Transkei and was conveyed from there into Natal? Was all this evidence immaterial? Was it false? Was the IFP correct in asserting that it was politically too 'incorrect' for the commission to raise these issues?

Why did the Goldstone commission investigate complaints against the SAP's Internal Stability Division (ISD) in Bruntville in the Midlands region in January 1993, but not the series of arson attacks against an IFP-supporting hostel in the township which had prompted the deployment of the ISD? Why did the commission decline to probe police evidence of the involvement of members of ANC SDUs in numerous acts of violence? Why did the commission move swiftly, by comparison, to investigate the attempted purchase by the KZP of firearms from Eskom?

Why, also, did the Goldstone commission fail to investigate the IFP's assertion that a secret SACP document revealed plans to destabilise KwaZulu in the run-up to the April 1994 election? Why did it not, as the IFP requested, subpoena Mr Pravin Gordhan, a prominent ANC and SACP leader, to investigate further his alleged knowledge of the contents of the document? Why did the Goldstone commission announce its bald conclusion-that in some 140 instances there was no evidence of Umkhonto involvement in the assassination of IFP leaders-without giving reasons for its finding, or explaining why it had discounted the evidence put before it by the police and the IFP? Was it not significant that in court proceedings in August 1995 an SACP member and Umkhonto cadre, Mr Hollingwood Mzwandile Gushu, was sentenced to a total of 235 years' imprisonment for the murder, in the early 1990s, of six IFP supporters-whom he had killed professionally and in cold blood and, by his own admission, 'because they were members of Inkatha'?

Why, in the period after the April 1994 election, did the assassination of IFP leaders continue? Could this have been the work of the 'third force'? Did it not instead reflect a continued determination on the part of the ANC to crush the IFP and wrest from it the control of KwaZulu/Natal? Why were IFP allegations that former Umkhonto cadres, now integrated into the new army, were responsible for harassing and attacking its members and officials, not investigated in public and in full? Why did the new police and army protect the ANC enclave at Shobashobane on the south coast, but not the IFP-supporting communities in the Izingolweni area allegedly under attack from the SDU established in the enclave? Why was the subsequent massacre at Shobashobane greeted with outrage, but not the numerous killings of IFP leaders and supporters-on the south coast and elsewhere-which had preceded it?

Why did the special investigation task units (ITUs) established to probe incidents of violence in the province focus primarily on attacks in which ANC supporters had been the victims? Why did they generally ignore the numerous assassinations of IFP leaders? Why, in the Malan trial, did the ITU responsible for gathering evidence apparently coach witnesses as to what they should say, and itself provide misleading testimony regarding security arrangements at Iscor where the AK-47 rifles allegedly used in the KwaMakhutha massacre in January 1987 were supposed to have been smelted down shortly after the attack?

Why were statements of fact reported in the press at the time of the KwaMakhutha massacre in January 1987 ignored during the trial? Why was it consistently reported in 1995 and 1996 that the house in question had belonged to Mr Victor Ntuli, a young UDF official, when press reports in January 1987 had stated that it belonged to his father, Mr Willie Ntuli, an Inkatha supporter? Why were the five or six attacks on Inkatha leaders and members in the three weeks preceding the KwaMakhutha massacre ignored? How feasible could it have been that Victor had been planning to hold a UDF meeting in his father's house, at a time when Inkatha was under attack from the UDF? Why did it not emerge during the trial that Victor had not been living at home for some three weeks-ever since the beginning of the clashes between Inkatha and the UDF? Why did the two Military Intelligence operatives who allegedly planned the attack say that it was motivated by the fact that the trainees were becoming restless and wanted to exercise their new-found skills, while a statement by Mr Daluxolo Luthuli (himself a trainee), gave the motive as revenge? The latter motive would have been consistent with the numerous attacks on Inkatha members which had occurred in early January 1987. But how could Mr Luthuli have expressed satisfaction at the outcome of a 'revenge' attack which had killed another Inkatha supporter, Mr Willie Ntuli, and various members of his family?

Why did the special investigation unit fail to follow the obvious leads pointing to ANC/UDF culpability for the massacre? Why did it instead seek to put the blame for the killings on the IFP's Caprivi trainees and on former senior security officers? Did it seek to do so by intimidating and then coaching witnesses as to the story they were to tell? Were the witnesses on which it relied not vulnerable to this kind of pressure, knowing that military careers in the new South Africa were likely to be closed to them and that a fresh start in a new country, aided by extensive financial support, would be the best option to pursue? Was this the reason the evidence put before the court in relation to the killings was so flawed and so untruthful? Was the state's failure to call corroboratory evidence not a reflection of the fact that no one else could be found to buttress the improbable story put forward by its three main witnesses?

Was the court, in short, deliberately being led in the wrong direction? Did Mr Justice Jan Hugo state that the massacre must have been committed by unknown Caprivi trainees-in an operation planned and implemented by Capt Opperman and Capt Cloete-because the special investigation unit had been assiduous in presenting to the prosecution and the court a misleading set of facts? Could the coaching of witnesses which emerged in the trial not have resulted in the 'broad correspondence' in their evidence which was the main factor underpinning this assessment, made by the court in passing before it proceeded to acquit all of the accused for lack of credible testimony?

Why, moreover, did the ANC block police investigation of the Shell House shootings-handing in more (but still not all) of the firearms in issue more than two years after the event-if it were true that the killings had been provoked by IFP leaders in league with elements within the police? Why did gunmen open fire in March 1994, from the roof of Shell House, on an essentially peaceful IFP protest march? Was it true that senior leaders of the ANC were among the snipers-and that police videos showed this to be the case? Why did Mr Mandela stop the police from searching Shell House-and why was this obstruction of justice allowed? Why, in addition, did the ANC subsequently block proposals by Dr Frank Mdlalose, premier of KwaZulu/Natal, to establish a commission of inquiry to probe the violence in full, rather than on the selective basis seemingly favoured by the ITUs in the province? Was the ANC's reluctance to allow a full investigation not prompted by its awareness of all it had to hide?

Questions Regarding the IFP Theory

Was it not, on the contrary, the emergence and growing strength of the UDF that prompted the outbreak of violence in KwaZulu and Natal in the mid-1980s? Did Inkatha not regard the region as its fiefdom, and was it not threatened by the popularity of the UDF, by the resurgence in support for the ANC? Did these factors not prompt Inkatha to resort to forced recruitment and violent attack to stop the UDF increasing its support in Pietermaritzburg and its environs?

Moreover, even if Inkatha was correct in accusing the ANC of pursuing a strategy of making South Africa ungovernable, was this not part of a just war against an apartheid system categorised by the General Assembly of the United Nations as a 'crime against humanity'? In addition, what evidence could Inkatha offer that this strategy had moved beyond attacking the apartheid state to embracing attacks on other black political organisations in the country? What rationale could the ANC-with its oft-reiterated commitment to multiparty democracy-have had for initiating a campaign of violence against Inkatha?

Did the former government-faced by a 'total onslaught' by the ANC in the 1980s-not have an interest in using Inkatha, as part of its 'total strategy', to attack and thus weaken the ANC alliance? Did the state not gain substantially from the violence in KwaZulu and Natal which, in that area at least, hindered the mobilisation and organisation of the people into ANC-supporting structures? Were the Trust Feed killings in 1988 not clear evidence of this agenda on the part of the former government? Could Trust Feed be dismissed as an isolated incident? Was the cover-up revealed in the trial in 1992 not indicative of police complicity in a strategy to weaken and destroy the UDF and promote Inkatha at its expense? Why did the government, following the trial, refuse to accede to requests for the appointment of a judicial commission of inquiry into the extensive police cover-up which had emerged? Was an inquiry in fact conducted by the retired regional court magistrate appointed by the government for this purpose? If so, why have its results not been widely publicised?

Why did emergency rule quell violence in other parts of South Africa in the mid-1980s but not in KwaZulu and Natal? Why did the police target the UDF for detention under emergency powers, but very few members of Inkatha? Why did the police not follow up clear prima facie evidence of Inkatha's culpability for violence, as reflected (for example) in an inquest finding that Inkatha supporters were responsible for the deaths of three trade unionists at Mpophomeni (Howick, Natal Midlands) in 1986? Why did the police not investigate further and why were those named as responsible not prosecuted?

Why did so many monitoring agencies identify Inkatha warlords and impis as responsible for the violence in Natal if this were not the case? Could all these agencies really, in practice, have been supporters of the UDF or ANC? Why did so many residents of areas affected by violence speak of police collusion with Inkatha if they had not witnessed this in fact?

Did the grant of interim interdicts against a number of Inkatha warlords not demonstrate the role that these and other Inkatha leaders had played in terrorising communities and thus compelling their allegiance to Inkatha? Why were these leaders not prosecuted thereafter? Was it not because the police had accorded them a special protection, and was unwilling to entertain the evidence against them?

Why did the former South African government provide secret funding for three IFP rallies and for the Inkatha-oriented United Workers' Union of South Africa? Did it intend that the IFP would use the money to buttress its support and intensify its vendetta against the ANC alliance? Why did the Seven Days' War begin two days after the government-funded Inkatha rally on 25 March 1990? Had Inkatha supporters in fact been encouraged to attack UDF areas surrounding Pietermaritzburg? Could there have been any element of truth in the allegation that the attacks-aimed at communities relatively far distant from the city-were provoked by the stoning of buses on the Edendale Road?

Why did the SADF train some 200 IFP supporters in the Caprivi strip in Namibia (then South West Africa) in 1986, and why were these men subsequently deployed as special constables in the KZP? Why did their training go beyond the limits of what was necessary for VIP protection? Why did so much secrecy appear to surround the operation? How many of these trainees were later used in hit-squad activities against the ANC? Was the purpose of Operation Marion-in terms of which the training had been provided-purely to defend Inkatha against attack by the ANC and the UDF? If so, why were there so many references in the documents regarding the operation to an 'offensive' element within it? Was the interpretation placed on this term by the court in the Malan trial-that it did necessarily denote aggression-inappropriately benign? Did the former government not have a clear interest in weakening the ANC alliance in the course of constitutional negotiations, and did it not continue to use the IFP-its tried and tested surrogate-for this purpose? Why did it not rein in its surrogate after it had concluded the Record of Understanding with the ANC in September 1992? Did it in fact intend that the IFP should continue with its task of weakening the ANC during key negotiations on a future constitution for the country? If so, why did it agree that hostels should be fenced and traditional weapons banned, when it must have known that this would limit the IFP's capacity to attack the ANC? Did it do so in the knowledge that this aspect of the agreement would never be enforced, as was indeed the case?

Did the former government not have an equal interest in using the IFP to attack and weaken the ANC in the run-up to the country's first non-racial election in April 1994? Was the NP not aware that it had little hope of returning to power at any time unless it could not only discredit the ANC but also make the costs of supporting it too high for people in the black community? Moreover, did elements within the party, knowing that the first election would spell the end of their parliamentary and other positions of power, not seek to delay through violence the transition to democracy-as the Goldstone commission indicated when it exposed the role of General Krappies Engelbrecht, General Johan le Roux and General Basie Smit in third-force activities a month before the April poll?

What, in addition, were the nature of the links between Military Intelligence (MI) and the IFP? Why did Mr de Klerk dismiss more than 20 senior army officers at the end of 1992, following a raid by the Goldstone commission on an MI organisation called the Directorate of Covert Collection? Why was the subsequent report of General Pierre Steyn regarding the role in violence of those dismissed never released to the public? Why were those dismissed not prosecuted for third-force crimes? Did this reflect a cover-up of their involvement in third-force violence?

Did the reports of the Goldstone commission and of the Transitional Executive Council (TEC) not prove the validity of the ANC's perspective on the violence-that it had been fuelled by a sinister third force comprising elements in the security forces working together with the IFP? Did it not also establish the truth of another oft-repeated ANC allegation-that the KZP was partisan towards the IFP and operated hit squads against the ANC? Was this not further confirmed by the evidence in mitigation provided by Mr Romeo Mbambo, convicted in 1995 of a number of murders, including the killing of a KZP officer who had been too co-operative with the Goldstone commission? Was it not also significant that the Goldstone commission-having investigated the murders of some 140 IFP leaders for alleged Umkhonto involvement-found no evidence to substantiate the allegation that the ANC's armed wing had played a part in their deaths? Was the conviction of Mr Hollingwood Mzwandile Gushu not an isolated and irrelevant incident, rather than proof of a broader pattern?

Were the self-protection units (SPUs) established by the IFP for purposes of defence against ANC attack, as the IFP alleged, or to give the IFP the capacity to resist the transition to democracy? Were the Mlaba trainees not given to understand that their function would primarily be to attack the ANC, as one informant told the TEC in early 1994? Were the tons of weapons dispatched to the Mlaba camp by Col Eugene de Kock, former Vlakplaas commander and proven hit-squad operative, intended purely for defensive purposes? If so, why was so great a quantity of weaponry required?

Did the trial and conviction of Col de Kock not demonstrate the extensive links between the former government and the IFP, as well as the lengths to which the National Party (NP) had been prepared to go to perpetuate its rule? Did the evidence provided by the former Vlakplaas commander not prove the ruthlessness of the secret security apparatus established by the former state to target the ANC both within and outside the country? Did it not show, in addition, what the ANC had long stated to be the case-that the former government had falsely blamed the ANC for bomb attacks (such as the one on Khotso House in 1988)-to deflect attention from its own role in propagating and perpetrating acts of violence? And was this not confirmed not only by other third-force trials, but also by evidence put forward to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission detailing the singular brutality of the security forces during the apartheid era, as well as their determination to crush the progressive movement regardless of how many lives this cost?

Did violence not persist in KwaZulu/Natal in the post-1994 election period precisely because the sinister third-force network established by the former state was difficult to uncover and destroy? Did the continued conflict not represent an unchanged agenda on behalf of the IFP and elements within the security forces to attack and harass the ANC, and try to weaken it yet further in a province it had failed to win in the April 1994 election? Was the onslaught by some 600 IFP supporters on Shobashobane on Christmas Day in 1995 not designed to strike terror into a community which had dared to align itself with the ANC-and thus make clear the message that any attempt to weaken the IFP's hold on the population of Izingolweni would be ruthlessly suppressed?

Was it not significant, moreover, that the deployment of the ITU in the south coast area-in the aftermath of the Shobashobane killings-appeared to mark the end of political violence in the area? Did violence not decline with the arrest of prominent IFP warlords in the area, coupled with intensive investigation of the police role in the Shobashobane massacre? Did this not prove the accuracy of the ANC's perspective-that violence in the province had been fuelled by a 'culture of impunity', which had been fostered in its turn by the failure of the police and prosecuting authorities to clamp down firmly on the criminals responsible for violence?

Had the attorney general in KwaZulu/Natal, Mr Tim McNally, not shown a marked reluctance over many years to prosecute IFP warlords responsible for violence? Had he not turned a blind eye to the numerous allegations of the police role in the conflict? Was the acquittal of General Magnus Malan and other former senior security officers not a function of his failure to call the additional witnesses necessary to corroborate the accomplice evidence the court was duty-bound to view with caution? Did he not deliberately bungle the prosecution, because he had no wish to see Gen Malan and his co-accused imprisoned?

Why did Mr McNally refuse, in addition, to prosecute prominent IFP members and KZP officers identified in the trial of Mr Romeo Mbambo and others as having been founder members of a hit squad based at eSikhawini (near Empangeni on the north coast of KwaZulu/Natal) and responsible for targeting ANC and UDF activists? Why did the KwaZulu/Natal attorney general decide that there was no reasonable prospect of a successful prosecution, when the Investigation Task Board (to which the ITUs in the province reported) was satisfied that a successful prosecution could indeed by attained by 'a meticulous and coherent presentation of the state's case and proper examination of defence witnesses'? Why did Mr McNally say he had detected discrepancies in the evidence of witnesses for the state, when the board believed these were not clear?

Were the allegations made by the IFP against the ITUs not intended to deflect attention from the evidence they were uncovering of IFP responsibility for violence? Were the party's allegations against the new army-particularly as regards the alleged role of former Umkhonto cadres in 'harassing' its supporters-not intended to do the same? Was the IFP not singularly irresponsible in trying to whip up anger against the security-force clampdown in the province, when statistics made it clear that this was succeeding in reducing the toll of death and injury?

Were the attacks against the security forces witnessed in the province in the post-election period not the product of this IFP campaign? Was the attack on the family of King Goodwill Zwelithini in KwaMashu in 1996 not similarly the result of the IFP's vilification of the Zulu monarch for having dared to sever his ties with Chief Buthelezi and assert a new political independence? Was the IFP not determined, moreover, to retain a feudal system of government in rural areas because it knew the traditional authorities responsible for implementing it could be relied upon to maintain the rural hinterland as a massive 'no-go area' for the ANC? Was the IFP not indeed a petty provincial party, trying-through continued violence-to increase its stature to match that of the ANC?


There is much that remains to be explained about the violence that has racked KwaZulu/Natal for close on 20 years. One thing is, however, clear. No simplistic theory of the violence-in which one side is regarded as entirely innocent and the other as entirely to blame-can be accepted as the truth. Reality, as always, is more complex. It must also be remembered that the truth is likely to be the first casualty in any conflict, and that propaganda is often used by one or more of the protagonists to skew perceptions of the facts.

This account provides the backdrop against which informed assessment of the conflict can be made. It is proffered in the hope that it will help to dispel some of the myths that have arisen around the relevant issues-and to provide the background against which varying theories regarding the violence can be tested for their truth.


Articles and books

(References to the Survey are to the South Africa Survey, formerly the Race Relations Survey and the Survey of Race Relations in South Africa, published by the South African Institute of Race Relations, Johannesburg)

Ad Hoc Crisis Committee, 'The crisis in Vulindlela and the Edendale Valley: 2531 March 1990'

'Affidavits: What they mean in South African law', Clarion Call, 1988/89 Special Edition

Africa South of the Sahara 198485, Fourteenth Edition, Europa Publications Ltd, London, 1984

African National Congress (ANC), 'Forward to Freedom: Strategy, tactics and programme of the African National Congress, South Africa', adopted at the Morogoro Conference, Tanzania, 1969

Aitchison J, 'Deaths from Political Violence in the Natal Midlands 19801992', Centre for Adult Education, University of Natal (Pietermaritzburg), 1993

Aitchison J J W, Numbering the dead: the course and pattern of political violence in the Natal Midlands: 19871989, unpublished thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts, Department of Political Studies, University of Natal (Pietermaritzburg), 1993

'All Quiet on the Radical Front as Inkatha Members Hacked to Death', Clarion Call, October/November 1984

'Archbishop Desmond Tutu-Do his views represent those of the majority of Anglicans?', Clarion Call, vol 3, 1986

Bekker S and Louw A, 'Capturing the Event - Conflict Trends in the Natal Region 19861992', Indicator SA Issue Focus, Centre for Social and Development Studies, Durban, 1992

Bhagowat C, 'After the Peace Accord: Conflict continues in KwaMakhutha', Work in Progress, no 73, March/April 1991

'Black Opinion', SA Report, 6 November 1987

Branford J, A Dictionary of South African English, Oxford University Press, Cape Town, 1978

Buthelezi M G, 'Address and presentation of his majesty the king of the Zulus to the people,' Stanger, 21 September 1991

Buthelezi M G, 'Affidavit', Clarion Call, 1989

Buthelezi M, 'Agreements between the state president and Dr Mandela', press statement released at Ulundi, 27 September 1992

Buthelezi M G, 'Aide-Memoire for Dr Mangosuthu Buthelezi for discussions with the state president, Mr F W de Klerk, and other members of the South African Government,' Cape Town, 16 September 1993

Buthelezi M, 'An Introduction to His Majesty the King of the Zulus and a Message to the People', Durban, 14 February 1994

Buthelezi M, 'Leadership and Democracy for the Women of South Africa: The challenges of structuring the road ahead', address to the 19th annual general conference of the Inkatha Women's Brigade, Emandleni Matleng, 26 October 1996

Buthelezi M G, 'Memorandum for discussion with Sir George Gardiner, MP from the United Kingdom, accompanied by Mr Andrew Hunter', Ulundi, 1 August 1991

Buthelezi M G, 'Policy speech addressed to the fourth session of the fifth KwaZulu Legislative Assembly', Ulundi, March 1992

Buthelezi M G, 'Statement by the Chief Minister' addressed to the KwaZulu Legislative Assembly during a snap debate on violence and intimidation and the ANC's withdrawal from Codesa and its mass action programmes, Ulundi, 30 June 1992

Buthelezi M G, 'To My American Friends', address to an international session of the National Urban League, Los Angeles, 7 August 1978, in Buthelezi M G, Power is Ours, Books in Focus Inc, New York, 1979

Buthelezi M G, 'What Foreigners Must Know', address to the Time magazine news tour, Johannesburg, 20 March 1978, in Buthelezi M G, Power is Ours, Books in Focus Inc, New York, 1979

Buthelezi M G, 'Why I established Inkatha', Clarion Call, 1987 Special Edition

Centre for Information Analysis, South Africa: An inter-regional profile, Development Bank of Southern Africa, Midrand, 1991

'Church Appeal for Inkatha and UDF to talk', Clarion Call, October/November 1984

'Codesa impasse inevitable on not one, but two crucial issues', South African Update, vol 4 no 4, May 1992

Consolidated Terms of Reference for International Mediation Agreed Upon by the ANC and IFP, 10 April 1994

Cronin J, 'For the Sake of Our Lives! Guidelines for the creation of people's self-defence units', Project for the Study of Violence: Seminar Paper No 2, University of the Wiwatersrand, Johannesburg, 1991

Cunningham-Brown N, 'The Natal violence continues', South Africa Foundation Review, February 1990

'Current Affairs', South African Report, 9 May 1991

De Kock W, Usuthu! Cry Peace! The Black Liberation Movement Inkatha and the Fight for a Just South Africa, The Gallery Press (Pty) Ltd, Cape Town, 1986

Deloitte Pim Goldby Management Consultants, report commissioned by the Department of Economic Affairs, KwaZulu Government, 'Government Expenditure in Natal KwaZulu (Region E): A regional comparison', December 1991

Desai A and Van Holdt K, 'Natal Violence: New Conditions, New Strategies' in South African Labour Bulletin, vol 15 no 4, November 1990

'Draft report on the KwaZulu/Natal local government election', prepared for the Deparment of Local Government and Housing, Pietermaritzburg, October 1996

Dugard J, Human Rights and the South African Legal Order, Princeton University Press, New Jersey and Surrey, 1978

'Effects of the violence on township residents', South Africa Foundation Review, Noveber 1990

Ellis S and Sechaba T, Comrades against Apartheid, the ANC and the South African Comunist Party in Exile, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indiana, and James Currey, London, 1992

Erasmus J, South Africa's Nine Provinces: A human development profile, Development Bank of Southern Africa, Development Information Paper, 1994

'First Inkatha and ANC peace accord holds hope for national reconciliation', South African Update, vol 2 no 13, 130 September 1990

Forsyth P, 'Pietermaritzburg Conflict Chronology: A Chronology of Political Develoments in Pietermaritzburg, 19801986', produced by the Project on Contemporary Conflict in Natal, Department of Historical Studies, University of Natal (Pietemaritzburg), April 1991

'Gatsha Buthelezi Thunders', Sechaba, February 1984

Gerhart G M and Karis T, 'Political Profiles 18821964', in Karis T and Carter GM (eds) From Protest to Challenge, A Documentary History of African Politics in South Africa 18821964, vol 4, Hoover Institute Press, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1977

Harber A and Ludman B (eds), Weekly Mail and Guardian AZ of South African Politics, The Essential Handbook-1994, The Penguin Group, England, 1994

Hobbes T, Leviathan, Part i, Ch 13

Hodgson K, 'The Role of Umkhonto we Sizwe in Violence', in Inkatha Freedom Party, Submissions to the Goldstone Commission at the Preliminary Hearing into Violence in Natal/KwaZulu, Durban, 30th November4th December 1992, 1992

Horrell M, Laws Affecting Race Relations in South Africa (To the end of 1976), South African Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR), Johannesburg, 1978

Hudson J, 'Violence in the Pretoria/Witwatersrand/Vereeniging Area 19901992: A Diary of Events,' SAIRR, Johannesburg, 1993

Human Rights Commission, Checkmate for Apartheid? A special report on two years of destabilisation, July 1990 to June 1992, Special Report SR-12, Johannesburg, 1992

Human Rights Commission, Three Years of Destabilisation: A Record of Political Violence in South Africa from July 1990 to June 1993, Special Report SR-13, Johannesburg, 1993

'IFP Submission to Goldstone commission, Pietermaritzburg's Imbali', South African Update, vol 4 no 4, May 1992

Inkatha Freedom Party, 'Amendment to Local Government Transition Act Sees Further Erosion of the Power of the Chiefs', IFP Information Centre, 1995

Inkatha Freedom Party, 'Comments on the Third Interim Report of the Goldstone Comission', 2 January 1993

Inkatha Freedom Party, 'Difficulties with the Commission of Inquiry into the Prevention of Public Violence and Intimidation', 8 April 1994

'Inkatha Freedom Party-List of Office Bearers killed, as of 1985 to 14 September 1991', in Inkatha Freedom Party, 'Report on Violence', 1992

Inkatha Freedom Party, 'The Role of Chieftainship in African Public Administration', addendum to Ngubane B, 'Statement on Behalf of the KwaZulu Government to the Commission of Inquiry Regarding Public Violence and Intimidation', December 1992

Inkatha Women's Brigade, Resolution adopted by the annual general conference of the Inkatha Women's Brigade, Ulundi, 1415 October 1989

'Is there a place for pragmatism?', Clarion Call, 1987, Special Edition

Jeffery A J, Conflict at the crossroads in Bophuthatswana, SAIRR, Johannesburg, 1993

Johnson R W, 'Understanding the Elections', in KwaZulu-Natal Briefing, no 3, Helen Suzman Foundation, August 1996

Kane-Berman J, 'Inkatha: The Paradox of South African Politics', Optima, vol 30 no 3, 1982

Kane-Berman J, Political Violence in South Africa, SAIRR, Johannesburg, 1993

Kane-Berman J, Soweto: Black Revolt, White Reaction, Ravan Press, Johannesburg, 1978

Karis T and Gerhart G M, 'Challenge and Violence 19531964', in Karis T and Carter GM, From Protest to Challenge: A documentary history of African politics in South Africa 18821964, vol 3, Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1977

Kentridge M, An Unofficial War, Inside the Conflict in Pietermaritzburg, David Philip, Cape Town, 1990

Keys R, 'Mpophomeni: The ANC's Dilemma', in Minnaar A, Patterns of Violence: Case Studies of Conflict in Natal, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, 1992

Kotze H and Greyling A, Political Organisations in South Africa-AZ, Tafelberg Publishers Ltd, Cape Town, 1991

'KwaZulu and Incorporation', Clarion Call, October/November 1984

'KwaZulu-Natal's new constitution: no losersany winners?' in KwaZulu-Natal Briefing, Helen Suzman Foundation, no 1, March 1996

'Lamontville-and what is really going on in the township', Clarion Call, October/ November 1984

Ligthelm A A, Martins J H, and Van Wyk H de J, Bureau of Market Research, South Africa's Nine Provinces: A Socio-Economic Profile, 1995, University of South Africa, Pretoria, Research Report no 221, 1995

Lodge T, Black Politics in South Africa Since 1945, Ravan Press, Johannesburg, 1983

Louw R, 'Ciskei set to become "next site of struggle" as ANC moves to weaken De Klerk's negotiating partners', Southern Africa Report, vol 10 no 32, 14 August 1992

Malan R, My Traitor's Heart, Blood and Bad Dreams: A South African Explores the Madness in his Country, his Tribe and Himself, Vintage, London, 1990

Manby B, 'South Africa, Threats to a New Democracy: Continuing Violence in KwaZulNatal', Human Rights Watch/Africa, vol 7 no 3, May 1995

Mandela N R, 'Statement of the president of the African National Congress, Nelson R Mandela, at the United Nations Security Council', New York, 15 July 1992

Mandela N, The struggle is my life, IDAF Publications Limited, London, 1990

Mansfield P, Powerhouse or Poorhouse, A Study of Black Urbanisation in the Durban Functional Region 19842000, Urban Foundation, 1985

Maré G and Hamilton G, An Appetite for Power: Buthelezi's Inkatha and the politics of 'loyal resistance', Ravan Press, Johannesburg, 1987

Mariño E, KwaZulu-Natal Emergency, The 1994 Emergency in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Statements and Observations from the International Observer to the Emergency, Durban-Johannesburg, AprilJuly 1994

Mazwai et al, Mau-Mauing the Media: New Censorship for the New South Africa, SAIRR, Johannesburg, 1991

Mdlalose F T, 'Opening Statement to the Negotiating Council', World Trade Centre, Johannesburg, 26 April 1993

Mfayela S, 'A Perspective on the Natal Violence', in Inkatha Freedom Party, Submissions to the Goldstone Commission at the Preliminary Hearing into Violence in Natal/KwZulu, Durban, 30th November4th December 1992, 1992

Minnaar A, '"Undisputed kings": Warlordism in Natal', in Minnaar A, Patterns of Violence: Case Studies of Conflict in Natal, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, 1992

Mzala, Gatsha Buthelezi: Chief with a Double Agenda, Zed Books, London, 1988

Ngubane B, 'Statement on Behalf of the KwaZulu Government to the Commission of Inquiry Regarding Public Violence and Intimidation', December 1992

'Nicaragua: Introductory Survey', in Europa World Yearbook, Europa Publications Ltd, London, 1994

Nkosi Z, 'The Lessons of Soweto', The African Communist, no 68, First Quarter, 1977

Ntsele W, 'ANC Political Intolerance', in Inkatha Freedom Party, Submissions to the Goldstone Commission at the Preliminary Hearing into Violence in Natal/KwaZulu, Durban, 30th November4th December 1992, 1992

Osborn H, 'The Richmond War: "A Struggle for Supremacy"', in Minnaar A, Patterns of Violence: Case Studies of Conflict in Natal, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, 1992

'Participation and Non-Participation: Dr Mangosuthu Buthelezi's role in KwaZulu', Clarion Call, vol 3, 1987

Powell P, 'Perspectives on the Role of Armed Struggle: Its relevance in the transitional period and the post apartheid era, Must we Inherit a Wasteland?', Community Development Foundation Seminar, 1 July 1993

Powell P, 'The Drive for Political Hegemony', in Inkatha Freedom Party, Submissions to the Goldstone Commission at the Preliminary Hearing into Violence in Natal/KwaZulu, Durban, 30th November4th December 1992, 1992

Powell P, 'Violence case study: Bruntville', South African Update, vol 4 no 3, April 1992

'Preliminary Report of the Transitional Executive Council Investigation Task Group into the matter of hit squads in the KwaZulu Police, flowing from the Fourth Interim Report of the Goldstone Commission, dated 6 December 1993', Pretoria, 22 March 1994

Ramaphosa M C, 'Closing address to the ANC National Policy Conference', Johanneburg, 2831 May 1992

Reed D, Beloved Country, South Africa's Silent Wars, Jonathan Ball Publishers, Johanneburg, 1994

'Rift widens between traditional chiefs, ANC' in Southern Africa Report, 12 July 1996

Roberts A, 'The Killing Streets', The Spectator, 18 January 1992

Sabelo M, 'Assassination of IFP Leaders', in Inkatha Freedom Party, Submissions to the Goldstone Commission at the Preliminary Hearing into Violence in Natal/KwaZulu, Durban, 30th November4th December 1992, 1992

'Sactu on Inkatha: no negotiations, no compromise, neturalise Buthelezi', South African Update, vol 1 no 6, 1 October14 October 1989

Shepherd Smith J, Buthelezi, The Biography, Hans Strydom Publishers, 1988

Sibeko A, 'The Underground Voice', The African Communist, no 68, First Quarter, 1977

Smith P, 'Violence Monitoring: Cautionary Comments', in Inkatha Freedom Party, Submissions to the Goldstone Commission at the Preliminary Hearing into Violence in Natal/KwaZulu, Durban, 30th November4th December 1992, 1992

South Africa News Information Service, Information Bulletin no 11, 17 March 1994

South African Communist Party, 'The KwaZulu-Natal Alternative is a Dead-End', The African Communist, no 109, Second Quarter, 1987

South African Institute of Race Relations, 'Durban: Diary of Destruction', Race Relations News, September 1985

South African Police 'Memorandum submitted on behalf of the South African Police before the Goldstone Commission sitting at Durban during the week 30 November 1992 to 4 December 1992', 1992

Special Commission on Negotiations, 'Transition to Democracy,' Report of the Special Commission on Negotiations to Plenary at the ANC National Policy Conference, 2831 May 1992

Stuart O O J, Pellissier G M and Burger M P, BER University of Stellenbosch Trends, vol15 no 4, December 1992, Bureau for Economic Research, Stellenbosch

'Supplementary Report of the Transitional Executive Council Investigation Task Group into the Matter of Hit Squads in the KwaZulu Police', 18 May 1994

Temkin B, Gatsha Buthelezi, Zulu Statesman, Purnell and Sons (Pty) Ltd, Cape Town, 1976

'The ANC, UDF and Inkatha: Background-Inkatha and the ANC', Clarion Call, vol 3, 1987

'The Renewed Emergency', Indicator SA, vol 5 no 2, Summer 1988

The World Alliance and Book of Facts, Pharos Books, New York, 1993

Tillet E, 'The New Phase of Low Intensity Warfare in Natal', Inkatha Freedom Party, Submissions to the Goldstone Commission at the Preliminary Hearing into Violence in Natal/KwaZulu, Durban, 30th November4th December 1992, 1992

'Unity and Organisation Mean Victory, Resolution on the current situation adopted by the Political Bureau of the South African Communist Party-September 1980', The African Communist, no 84, First Quarter, 1981

'Violence breaks out immediately after the 29 January accord', South African Update, vol 3 no 2, February 1991

'We Must Break with False Leaders', Mayibuye, no 5, 1984

'What is behind the name-calling?', Clarion Call, 1987, Special Edition

'What Liberation Will Bring to Us', Clarion Call, October/November 1984

Woods G, 'An illustrated model of the causes of violence', unpublished paper, 1992

Woods G, 'An Inkatha account of the violence connected to the NECC conference held in Congella, Durban, in March 1986', unpublished paper, 21 April 1995

Woods G, 'An Inkatha viewpoint', South Africa Foundation Review, August/September 1993

Woods G, 'Inkatha Report on the Violence in Natal', Inkatha Institute, Durban, 1990

Zwelithini G, 'A Claim for the Sovereignty of the Zulu Kingdom', Durban, 14 February 1994

Zwelithini G, 'Memorandum for Presentation to the State President, The Hon F W De Klerk', Durban, 14 February 1994

Reports of commissions of inquiry

Miscellaneous reports

Cillié P M, Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Riots at Soweto and elsewhere from June 16, 1976 to February 28, 1977, 1980

Middleton A J, Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the Violence which occurred on 29 October 1983 at the University of Zululand (Volume 1), 1986

Reports of the Commission of Inquiry Regarding Public Violence and Intimidation

(These reports are listed in date order.)

Goldstone R J, Interim Report on the Violence at Mooi River, 19 February 1992

Goldstone R J, Rossouw R J and Van Zyl Smit D, Further Report to the Commission of Inquiry Regarding the Prevention of Public Violence and Intimidation from the Comittee established to Enquire into Events at Mooi River on 3 and 4 December 1991, 19 February 1992

Goldstone R J, Rossouw D J and Van Zyl Smit D, Report to the Commission of Inquiry Regarding the Prevention of Public Violence and Intimidation from the Committee Established to Inquire into the Events at Mooi River on 3 and 4 December 1991, 19 February 1992

Goldstone R J, Second Interim Report, 29 April 1992

Goldstone R J, Report of the Commission of Inquiry Regarding the Prevention of Public Violence and Intimidation regarding an investigation by the Commission's Natal Ivestigation Team into allegations of the presence of Renamo soldiers in KwaZulu, 15 December 1992

Goldstone R J, Third Interim Report, 21 December 1992

Van Zyl Smit D and Geyser A J L, Report to the Commission of Inquiry Regarding the Prevention of Public Violence and Intimidation by the committee established to investigate violence at Mooi River and the causes thereof, 21 December 1992

Goldstone R J, Report to the commission by the committee appointed to inquire into allegations concerning front companies of the SADF and the training by the SADF of Inkatha supporters at the Caprivi in 1986, 1 June 1993

Sithole M N S, Van Zyl L S and Roberts J S N, Report on the Illegal Importation, Distribtion and Use of Firearms, Ammunition and Explosives, 5 October 1993

Goldstone R J, Fourth Interim Report of the Commission of Inquiry Regarding the Prvention of Public Violence and Intimidation, Cape Town, 6 December 1993

Wallis M J D, Geyser A J L and Zondo R M M, Second Interim Report of the Wallis Committee of the Goldstone Commission, 5 March 1994

Goldstone R J, Interim Report on Criminal Political Violence by Elements within the South African Police, the KwaZulu Police and the Inkatha Freedom Party, 18 March 1994

Wallis M J D, Geyser A J L and Zondo R M M, Interim Report of the Wallis Committee of the Goldstone Commission, 18 March 1994

Goldstone R J, Final Report by the Commission of Inquiry regarding Public Violence and Intimidation on Attacks on Members of the South African Police, 21 April 1994

Goldstone R J, Report on the Shooting Incidents which Took Place in the Centre of Johanesburg on Monday, 28 March 1994, 21 April 1994

Goldstone R J, Report on the Preliminary Inquiry into the Attempted Purchase of Firearms by the KwaZulu government from Eskom, 22 April 1994

Goldstone R J, Final Report of the Goldstone Commission, 27 October 1994

Legislation (enacted or proposed)

Arms and Ammunitions Act no 75 of 1969

Bantu Affairs Administration Act no 45 of 1971

Bantu Authorities Act no 68 of 1951

Bantu Education Act no 47 of 1953

Bantu (Urban Areas) Consolidation Act no 25 of 1945

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa no 200 of 1993

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Amendment Act no 2 of 1994

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Second Amendment Act no 44 of 1995

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Defence Act no 44 of 1957

Electoral Act no 202 of 1993

Group Areas Act no 41 of 1955

House of Traditional Leaders Act no 7 of 1994 (KwaZulu/Natal)

Human Rights Commission Bill

Internal Security Act no 74 of 1982

Joint Executive Authority for KwaZulu and Natal Act no 80 of 1986

Local Government Transition Act Amendment Act no 61 of 1995

National Key Points Act no 102 of 1980

Peace Bill (KwaZulu/Natal)

Police Act no 7 of 1958

Population Registration Act no 30 of 1950

Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act no 55 of 1949

Prohibition of Political Interference Act no 51 of 1968

Public Safety Act no 3 of 1953

Remuneration of Traditional Leaders Act no 29 of 1995

Republic of South Africa Constitution Act no 110 of 1983

Reservation of Separate Amenities Act no 49 of 1953

Security Forces Board of Inquiry Act no 95 of 1993

Security Intelligence and State Security Council Act no 64 of 1972

South African Police Service Act no 68 of 1995

Suppression of Communism Act no 44 of 1950

Unlawful Organisations Act no 34 of 1960


State v Baleka and others, Transvaal Provincial Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa, case no 482/85, judgment delivered on 15 November 1988

State v De Kock, Transvaal Provincial Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa, case no 266/94, judgment delivered on 9 September 1996

State v Msane and others, in the Supreme Court of South Africa, Durban and Coast Local Division, case no CC1/96, judgment delivered on 10 October 1996

In the Constitutional Court of South Africa, Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, case no CCT 23/96, judgment delivered on 6 September 1996

In the Constitutional Court of South Africa, in the matter between The Premier of KwaZulNatal and others, and The President of the Republic of South Africa and others, case no CCT 36/95, judgment delivered on 29 November 1995

This resource is hosted by the Nelson Mandela Foundation, but was compiled and authored by Padraig O’Malley. Return to theThis resource is hosted by the site.